Tastes Funny created this video completely originally. It isn’t the only TRON mashup that’s floating around, but we think it’s the best. Big thanks to GU for help with the graphics. If you see any sweet graphics in there, that’s him!

Here’s a literal version of the TRON: Legacy trailer, for comparison:

This TRONified modern times was created by Vimeo user Nick Tierce.

And then South Park had their own TRON parody — of course.

We’re trying to get a nice HD version that can be watched full screen up soon, but in the meantime, enjoy a somewhat okay streaming Quicktime here.

This just posted to the YouTubes! By my pal David Brundige. Check out his other stuff at Ridge Pictures.

Image courtesy Erich Eilenberger.

• Assistant to the Executive Producer
• Master
• Killer

Image Copyright Erich Eilenberger 2009. Posted with permission.

Advance Auto Parts
James Joyce
Assistant Manager

Image Copyright Erich Eilenberger 2009. Posted with permission.

This lead to my unsuspecting purchase of a Clorox Bleach Pen. It was not until getting said bleach pen home that I caught the explicit notice on the front of the packaging.

“The Stain Remover for Whites,” eh? What’s next, Clorox, separate water fountains? Can our president not use this bleach pen? I thought we’d come so far…

For shame, Clorox, for shame.

To the same subjects, she also showed clips of heterosexual sex, male and female homosexual sex, a man masturbating, a woman masturbating, a chiseled man walking naked on a beach and a well-toned woman doing calisthenics in the nude.

While the subjects watched on a computer screen, Chivers, who favors high boots and fashionable rectangular glasses, measured their arousal in two ways, objectively and subjectively. The participants sat in a brown leatherette La-Z-Boy chair in her small lab at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health… The genitals of the volunteers were connected to plethysmographs — for the men, an apparatus that fits over the penis and gauges its swelling; for the women, a little plastic probe that sits in the vagina and, by bouncing light off the vaginal walls, measures genital blood flow. … The participants were also given a keypad so that they could rate how aroused they felt.

Ignore, for the moment, what sort of subjects volunteer for wearing a genital blood-pressure cuff while watching porn. You can see what the point of the study is — to measure what we think turns us on vs. what actually turns us on. Men, unsurprisingly, were completely transparent.

The men, on average, responded genitally in what Chivers terms “category specific” ways. Males who identified themselves as straight swelled while gazing at heterosexual or lesbian sex and while watching the masturbating and exercising women. They were mostly unmoved when the screen displayed only men. Gay males were aroused in the opposite categorical pattern. Any expectation that the animal sex would speak to something primitive within the men seemed to be mistaken; neither straights nor gays were stirred by the bonobos. And for the male participants, the subjective ratings on the keypad matched the readings of the plethysmograph. The men’s minds and genitals were in agreement.

All was different with the women. No matter what their self-proclaimed sexual orientation, they showed, on the whole, strong and swift genital arousal when the screen offered men with men, women with women and women with men. They responded objectively much more to the exercising woman than to the strolling man, and their blood flow rose quickly — and markedly, though to a lesser degree than during all the human scenes except the footage of the ambling, strapping man — as they watched the apes. And with the women, especially the straight women, mind and genitals seemed scarcely to belong to the same person. The readings from the plethysmograph and the keypad weren’t in much accord. During shots of lesbian coupling, heterosexual women reported less excitement than their vaginas indicated; watching gay men, they reported a great deal less; and viewing heterosexual intercourse, they reported much more. Among the lesbian volunteers, the two readings converged when women appeared on the screen. But when the films featured only men, the lesbians reported less engagement than the plethysmograph recorded. Whether straight or gay, the women claimed almost no arousal whatsoever while staring at the bonobos.

Why did women get aroused no matter what image was on the screen? Chivers says she feels like a pioneer at the edge of a great forest. The Times article devotes pages to discussing this “great question that has never been answered.” I think the question was already answered, if you read carefully.

What do women want?

…a little plastic probe that sits in the vagina…

Of course they were turned on by everything. They were sitting on a dildo!